Відео

still works, thanks a lot for enabling me to continue to stay dependant on this finicky software lol

I modified my driver to get 3d vision 2 running... So sad, that nvidia dropped 3d gaming.

Is there a template to Use for Meta Quest II or III?. i asked because so far no software worked for me but only gave the movie depth but not 180 or 360 true VR

This is interesting! thanks!

Man kollar lamporna först🤨 Han river isär halva hojen, SEN kollar lampan, hoppas alla lärde sig något 😂

Finally, I just made my first post using this updated technique and sure enough, total success! I don't know if YT will let me link the video so I'll just drop the ID if you want to check out the result: cJVNduh3zHM Again, big thank you for pointing out the trick.

Looking forward to it

This is good. Im going to reboot my 3D channel soon with some new videos.

i got 3d vision discover glasses with my zotac 9800gt 1gb and i used to play Fo3 in Anaglyphic 3d, is that a setting in here?

work around, but still no solution. even on 21

I combine both depth maps from Owl3D and DaVinci Resolve Studio. Anaglyph looks fantastic on my 75" Roku Plus tv. My workflow used WheatstoneHolmes' first video along with additional nodes. ua-cam.com/video/nxGD6NgXpgE/v-deo.html

You're my only hope. I've searched all over. I bought a Qoocam ego. They just did a big update on software apparently and if you go to the site, they have standalone software to upload to UA-cam with proper Metadata. The software also has a convergence dial to manually adjust but I don't understand it. Can you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do a video about this? I just want to use my new cam and know how to make simple 3d 180 video. I'm at a loss right now and sooo disappointed in how hard it is to find info/video on step by step. PLEEEEEASE help us

This video pops like crazy in 3-D

fantastic. thank you very much

The beefcake guy could definitely be Indy's Sallah on this particular adventure.

For me, first it renders out of sync and then for no reason the audio no longer works in the projects. any idea?

I need to drop by here and say thanks: I had an old script that would run that very command, but originally stereo_mode was an enum, and left_right was actually 1. So all I had to do is modify that old script to specify left_right instead and voila, I should be gucci. I knew the solution would be simple and cryptic, just it took almost a year for me to find the solution, and it's actually you that found it, so thanks!

really good 3D depth, which camera did you use to make this video?

Oh dear lord not Vegas LOL This is getting annoying. Even the standard mp4 3D setting isn't getting picked up.

So here's the thing... my recent 3D uploads (specifying Side by Side in Voukoder side options) have all been showing as plain side by side on desktop, while some don't even work correctly in the VR player (it's been hit and miss, especially on my second, smaller channel) ...my question to you: since your recent uploads all work perfectly on desktop with the anaglyph playback, what do you use to specify the Side-by-Side format? (ie what are you using to encode)

The problem is UA-cam. Years ago you could select the format to play 3D video, now they don't give you any choice, so if you don't like anaglyph, you're screwed. It appears that 4K is not treated as 3D and not shown in anaglyph. That's fine with me, I don't like anaglyph and have ways to view half-width SBS.

I made and uploaded a YT3D test using your hawaiian shirt beefcake animation. Used my usual procedure for S3D videos. Tagged you on the upload. I don't know if it sent a notification since it's unlisted: qkJyGh4q0nI But none of the 4K S3D vids will properly display in browser (Chrome), on mobile, or in UA-cam VR on Quest. Your 1080p videos work properly everywhere.

Nice job bro

Interesting, it's being shown in half-width SBS. Yesterday and before 3D videos would have been anaglyph. One change is that I linked my UA-cam account with the app on my Quest 3. Wonder if that is why, of did it change for everyone, or is it because this one is 4K? Or... is the metadata missing from the video? I would prefer SBS because that will work on 3D TVs in full screen mode.

The left and right has been swapped? I guess users can flip their anaglyph glasses. :)

This should've worked. Hmmmm....

It only shows it to me as anaglyph on my PC using Chrome browser. It should offer the option of side-by-side so you could make it full screen to view in 3D on TVs, but it doesn't. Don't like anaglyph. I can download your video and it is saved as half-width SBS, then I can view it on other media in 3D.

I wish I could get as excited about UA-cam 3D as this dancing hooligan. The situation is grim. At least this video works properly.

Im not sure why you're crapping on the last attempt, I've had to refer back to that video at least 20 times to make my home movies into VR content . The only thing I changed was I cut the subject(s) out of the background. Then I projected the background and map it using the method below (*sometimes in tight shots I need to piece together a background or completely fabricate one .) Copy it cut the background out so its just the subject this time and boom I use your method on both of them , line them up and we have vr . I used this method ua-cam.com/video/FnAjIDcJdhM/v-deo.htmlsi=mSQPlZ2C2C5XQL9n

Cool. Blender and Mixamo? What aspect of UA-cam 3D are you testing? 3D on UA-cam is almost useless because it only gives two options: 2D or anaglyph. Who thought that was okay? They decided people would be too confused if given even one more format. If half-width side-by-side were available in full screen, then you could use it on a wide variety of displays, like most 3D tvs. Ironically, if you download the video it is in half-width SBS, so I guess they want people to download?

FIRST

Good tips thanks

This doesn't work well at all for me. It's either in 3D a little bit and super distorted or you can't notice the 3D effect at all. For anaglyph, I think what you want to do is split the channels to R, G, and B, then displace the R and B channels separately with the depth map/displacement maps. I would have to play with it, but that at least seems like there would be more control there.

It's insane but apparently Vegas 21 still has that same crash issue!!! From what I understand when you "render" the software is trying to phone in to the mothership before bringing that window...for some strange reason, no idea why that should be in the design but I wouldn't be surprised if that is causing it on media heavy projects. Thank you - that tip worked!!!

Is it also possible in DVR 18 to export for an active shutter 3D system?

nope it crashed, i was using intel cpu last time and it was fine now i have amd and its crashing

All I wanted to do was take a 2D image + depth map to get an SBS image! Heck, I guess I will have to try to make my own software for doing that!

Would u be able to add disparity for pop out purposes say for bigscreen VR cinema experience? I know there is a disparity mode but how exactly would I set it up in unison with this mode map uve created? I know other standalone programs use disparity to increase popout of foreground I assume u can do the same with this since the disparity node exists and also uses the depthmap

Hi, I used this method to try and convert an 'old' movie from 2D to 3D. Or rather, from your older video, with the Camera3D still in it. First try didn't give a good result, but when I found out what I did wrong, the 2nd try was much better. Although it is servicable, it could still be better. Because of the extrusion of the imageplane, you obviously will end up with warping around the '3D' parts, especially the harder you want to make things pop. So I was thinking of creating 'layers', with different Depth Map settings. So for example, one for things in the back, one for the main subjects in the movie and one for some elements in the foreground (maybe even 4 'layers'). As I'm not yet too familiar with Davinci Resolve beyond basic editing, I was wondering if you could help me figure out how to do some things I want to do: - From a MediaIn, I want to use a Depth Map by using the 'Isolate' settings, to use as a mask for a certain level of depth: so 1 for the background, one for the main subjects (where the focus of the movie is) and one for stuff in the foreground. So each of them probably needs its own Imageplane? So I can offset them a bit in 3D space. Although at the moment, I only seem to get 1 Imageplane in view. - I want to use these Depth Maps to mask another Depth Map, whereby the settings are specifically set for that 'layer'. So for example, for the 'background' Imageplane I can set values more extreme to get a 3D "pop" in there, without having to worry that the main subjects are extruded (and thus deforming) too much. Same for the other 'layers'. So each 'layer' would also have its own Displace. - Can 1 MediaIn go into several nodes, or do I have to keep copying a new MediaIn? So how would that look like, using the setup like in this video (or better yet, your older video with the Camera3D)? I think I'm combining in the wrong order and/or attaching to the wrong input/outputs.

Thanks again for this - I'll be trying it!

To fix the black bars you have to go into the project settings and adjust the dimensions from there as well as when you build it. This took me way to long to figure out lol

Nice doing this in 3D.

Unfortunately my mom isnt here watching this 3D. The 3D in your introduction was AMAZING. I have no idea how you pulled that off. Sadly the GOW game captures didnt look so hot on my TV. It was back then so its understandable i always am happy to binge your stuff when i have time ❤

Works with 2 insta360 x3?

You should also be able to output custom dimensions of 3840x1080 for full side-by-side. I just made a short video of stereoscopic animations rendered from blender as 3840x1080 (1920x1080 side-by-side), simply output as same format.

Great Video, A lot Easier to follow, I have tested a lot of the so called 2d to 3d (SBS) convertors but they leave a lot to be desired to be honest. At least this workflow allows you more control. Cheers.

Everyone uses OWL3D but I think it's awesome your experimenting I'm a proud subscriber

It would be interesting to see a comparison between this and Owl3D, such as payments, depth map accuracy, and ease of use (which, of course, Owl3D wins, but at what cost or compression)

nope, in fact i was testing with media generator things

a really awsome video, thanks for sharing the techniques, I just bought a pair of vr glasses, can't wait to convert my drone footage to stereoscopic!